Unbelievable? Do extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? Jonathan McLatchie vs Jonathan Pearce

Debating-Extraordinary-Claims_Web-Header_article_image.jpg

‘Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’ is often used as a maxim by skeptics against modern miracle claims and Biblical miracles.

Christian apologist Jonathan McLatchie and atheist blogger Jonathan Pearce debate the ‘prior probabilities’ involved in miracle claims and the evidence for the resurrection.

Want to read more? REGISTER FREE for Premier Unbelievable? Membership!

If you are already a Member  or have an account  with another Premier website, you can SIGN IN now.

 

Register for a FREE Premier Unbelievable? Membership

Be equipped to confidently defend your Faith, tackle untruths and demonstrate that the Gospel is good news for everyone.

Membership includes unlimited access to the website, a weekly newsletter, bonus content and much more.

 

To continue reading REGISTER FOR FREE MEMBERSHIP